Attorney General Merrick Garland, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco and FBI Director Christopher Wray announced Monday their latest plans to scrutinize Americans under the guise of combating “election threats.”
Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has direct ties to the historic persecution of opposition candidate Donald J. Trump, led a discussion in Washington, D.C. today about threats to the election.
When he speaks on current electoral threats, he should be the first to mention his name.
Merrick Garland today cited the work the Department of Justice and FBI are doing to protect elections from national security threats. Garland added, “This includes the work of our national security community and the FBI to protect our elections from national security threats, including foreign malign influence and cyber activity.”
Talk about gaslighting! Here are three of Washington, D.C.’s most controversial and corrupt officials speaking out today about clean elections.
Rep. Dan Bishop (R-N.C.) noted the convenient timing of Garland and Wray’s announcement.
Just last week, the Biden administration was forced to dismantle and dismantle a group of deep state operatives including James Clapper and John Brennan following a lawsuit filed by America First Law and Ambassador Richard Grenell. Illegitimate Homeland Security Intelligence Panel.
It only took them a week to announce their latest campaign to censor and silence Americans.
Time is convenient. When one aspect of the review-industrial complex is shut down, a new one emerges.
In this game of whack-a-mole, the characters are always the same. We will eradicate them wherever they appear. https://t.co/A2evldS975 pic.twitter.com/uwYDgvTDBs
— Rep. Dan Bishop (@RepDanBishop) May 13, 2024
Cybersecurity expert Mike Benz then weighed in on the latest developments from government censorship agencies.
Mike Benz: The trick here is that all “misinformation narratives” are considered to have a movement behind them, and any American civilian who clicks the retweet button to amplify said narrative is considered to be part of said “movement”
The trick here is that all “misinformation narratives” are considered to have a movement behind them, and any American civilian who clicks the retweet button to amplify said narrative is considered to be part of said “movement” https://t.co/FXbH8QeVSY
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) May 13, 2024
They set off!
Earlier today, Mike Benz spoke with Lou Dobbs about the government censorship system.
Mike Benz: This is an extraordinary scandal that really started in the run-up to the 2020 election when, for the first time ever, the United States established a permanent domestic review office at CISA and, as you mentioned, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency An agency of the Department of Homeland Security, it uses a very cunning trick to gain long-arm jurisdiction over opinions on the Internet. What they do is they say there’s something called critical infrastructure, which ranges from elections to public health to basically any sensitive policy issue. If you post online that undermines the public’s faith and confidence in that critical infrastructure, you are effectively conducting a cybersecurity attack on U.S. critical infrastructure, thereby requiring intervention by the Department of Homeland Security through review. .
This dirty trick of calling online censorship cybersecurity is how the Department of Homeland Security gets involved in the business. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI are joining forces in the 2020 election. They also created a series of incisions in the private sector and academia to serve as attack dogs for DHS content, targeting social media content that DHS wanted removed. This is an extraordinary scandal that broke out around 2022.
My organization, FFO, is a pioneer in reporting this. There have been probably four or five congressional hearings and three or four lawsuits on this matter. One of them is currently awaiting a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court. But because the Supreme Court stayed the injunction, the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI were effectively barred from doing what they had just been done by trial and appeals courts because those courts ruled that it violated the temporary injunction. First Amendment.
But the Supreme Court waived that, which is standard procedure for them as they deliberate after oral arguments and all briefs have been filed. So the FBI and DHS are using this lull, awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision, to resume the same dirty work they did in the 2020 election, and I should add, they By his own math, he reached 22 million tweets in the 2020 election. They boasted on tape that the legality of election process policies would not have been in place without pressure from the Department of Homeland Security.
exist @LouDobbs This week, I detail:
1. Resurrection of CISA review shop
2. What’s at stake in the Supreme Court’s biggest case
3. Blob uses “Boomerang” VS “Knife” pic.twitter.com/1wLBKRJ3rJ— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) May 14, 2024
Mike Benz talks about the Supreme Court case, Muti v. Missouri, which includes The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft, one of the five plaintiffs.
show time! Gateway Pundit holds oral arguments today before the Supreme Court in Murthy et al. v. State of Missouri et al., No. 23-411—the most important free speech case in U.S. history
