“Final September, I obtained a suggestion from Sam Altman to rent me to voice the present ChatGPT 4.0 system. He informed me that he felt that by voicing the system, I may bridge the hole between tech firms and artistic individuals. hole and assist customers really feel comfy with the dramatic adjustments in human and synthetic intelligence. He mentioned he felt my voice would deliver consolation to individuals.
After a lot consideration and for private causes, I declined the supply. 9 months later, my associates, household, and the general public have been noticing how a lot the latest system, referred to as “Sky,” appeared like me.
Once I heard the demo launched, I used to be shocked, offended, and in disbelief that Mr. Altman would pursue a voice that sounded so just like mine that even my closest associates and the information media couldn’t inform the distinction. Mr. Ultraman even advised that the resemblance was intentional, tweeting the phrase “her” — a reference to the movie during which I voiced Samantha, a chat system who develops an intimate relationship with a human. .
Two days earlier than the ChatGPT 4.0 demo was launched, Mr. Altman contacted my agent and requested me to rethink. The system already exists earlier than we join.
On account of their actions, I used to be compelled to rent authorized counsel, who wrote two letters to Mr. Altman and OpenAI setting out what they’d completed and asking them to element the precise course of of making the “Sky” voice. Because of this, OpenAI reluctantly agreed to take away the voice of “Sky”.
As all of us grapple with the difficulty of deepfakes and shield our personal likenesses, our personal work, our personal identities, I consider these points deserve absolute readability. I stay up for points being resolved with transparency and applicable laws being handed to assist guarantee particular person rights are protected.
