Study dubbing
One of many scorching matters on Chinese language radio, tv and media up to now three weeks has been the Worldwide Science Discussion board held in Kashgar on June 12. Not a “seminar”. The present was written by the Chinese language authorities and stars loyal Chinese language authorities officers, specifically educated historians, linguists and cultural students, and their international gossip. Location: “Kashgar Alimu Resort” in Kashgar, one of many cities the place Uighurs reside quickest.
At this assembly, Chinese language historians as soon as once more tried to drive the worldwide neighborhood to simply accept that the Uyghur area has all the time been a part of China. Their objective is to make folks consider that the Uyghurs had been immigrants who moved to the Tarim Valley after 840, not the scientific neighborhood.
Among the many 39 “chosen” folks at residence and overseas who performed the position of “consultants” on this political recreation referred to as “the assembly”, the 2 Chinese language researchers who performed a number one position had been notably distinguished, specifically Yang Shengmin, an skilled on Uyghur historical historical past on the Chinese language Academy of Sciences. . New Rouge. Though the 2 have completely different analysis fields, they’ve each been engaged in brainwashing Uyghur youth and observing their nationwide sentiments as lecturers for a few years. This time, Yang Shengmin requested: “Who’re the locals within the Tarim Valley?” and gave a report entitled “Historical past of Xinjiang”. When speaking in regards to the Uyghurs within the report, he stated: “Present anthropological analysis on the Uyghurs reveals that the Uyghurs originated from the Uighurs. They migrated from the Mongolian grasslands to the Tarim River Basin round 840 AD, and joined different folks dwelling there. The ethnic teams combined collectively to kind the Uighur-speaking Chiang folks and the Chinese language folks. “The Tarim Basin has all the time been a spot the place many ethnic teams, together with the Chinese language folks, reside collectively. “
Who’re the Uighurs and Turks? What’s their relationship with the Huns? Are they actually immigrants from Uyghur areas? How do historic supplies reply Chinese language historians like Yang Shengmin? He stated that the Uighurs are immigrants and the Chinese language are locals. Is not this “cat chasing home cat”?
Yang Shengmin’s report might be stated to be a abstract of his lifelong gross sales. He printed it in 1991 and included it as a course in ethnic universities in his e book “Historical Uyghurs”. The Tulas folks have a really shut relationship with the Huaxia folks. So somebody wrote that the ancestors of Uyghurs and Chinese language persons are the identical individual. He described the Turks and Huns as everlasting rivals with no racial connection to one another. When he wrote in regards to the Uighur tribe in historical past, he continued his pretense and stated, “The ten Uighur tribes and 9 remoted tribes in Tula reside in battle with the Turkic tribes north of the Siberian Desert and have a detailed relationship.” In his articles and books, he hid his Turkish-Uyghur brotherhood, each of whom had been descendants of the Huns. He believed that the Huns and Turks had been the nations that oppressed the Uyghurs, and he tried to arouse the suspicion of those that learn his e book that the ancestors of the Turks and Uyghurs weren’t the identical folks. He used the conspiracy to dispel the parable that the Uyghurs had been an immigrant individuals who migrated to the land that’s now the Uyghurs in AD 840.
Yang Shengmin wrote at first of the e book: “The traditional Uyghur nation originated from Beidi. Beidi was one of many earliest historical ethnic teams to reside in our nation. They had been lively in Beidi greater than 2,000 years in the past.” In China The northwest area is adjoining to numerous tribes of the Chinese language folks. Is not the land of at this time’s Uyghurs he talked about right here meant by Yang Shengmin to tell apart the Turks? residence information.
If we test the knowledge in China’s oldest historic supplies, we are going to discover that earlier than the well-known Chinese language spy Zhang Qian was dominated by the Huns, the phrase “Western Kingdom” didn’t even exist in Chinese language historical past books. The phrase doesn’t even seem in Zhang Cheng’s journey notes, that are positioned in chapter 123 of the historian Simachian’s e book. This phrase seems 3 times within the “Historic Data”. The primary two occasions point out the title of the nation. Its residents are Ulu Yaochi, Jiang and different ethnic teams. The ruler is the Xiongnu, positioned to the south of the Xiongnu. The third time, the nation was used over a big space, together with the scattered lands of the Sogdians who lived underneath the rule of the Huns.
If we take a look at the information of 36 international locations within the Western Areas within the e book “Hannamei” written by the Chinese language historian Ban Gu in 89 AD, we are going to discover that there are not any information of Chinese language residents dwelling in these international locations. In 630, Xuanzang turned a monk in Uyghur land for practically a yr and recorded intimately what he noticed and heard. In his biography, he wrote that he cried when he noticed two compatriots in Hamul, however didn’t write that he noticed one other Chinese language in Turpan, Karamanhal, and Kuqa. Doesn’t this show that there are not any Chinese language there? !
One among China’s well-known historic books, “Yeni Tangnameche” and “Uighur Tazkelsi”, begins with the sentence “The Uighurs are the ancestors of the Huns.” Fashionable Chinese language historians insult their very own ancestors by admitting that the Uyghurs had been Huns and writing: “They had been unsuitable.” But it surely avoids answering why others would repeat the identical mistake. Are Chinese language historic supplies, such because the “Historical past of the Previous 5 Dynasties” written in 907, the “Tong Jing Lun Tong” written in 1307, and even the “Tong Annotations” accomplished in 1783, all spelling errors?
In response to the well-known Chinese language historic supplies “Historic Data”, Article 110 “Zun” and “Hanshu” Article 94, “Across the eleventh century BC, there was a herdsman in northern China named Xiongnu. They often referred to as themselves “Hu” . Chinese language chronicles from completely different eras have fully completely different descriptions of “Hu”. The phrase was first used to consult with the Huns, and later to the Indo-European “Sogdians” within the 630s. The monk Xuanzang recorded that “Hu” was used because the title of different ethnic teams besides the Han folks.
The Uighurs know that the Huns are their ancestors, and so they additionally know that they’re Turks. Due to this fact, in the course of the Uighur Dynasty, there was little distinction between the ethnic names “Uighur” and “Turk”. They name their language “Turkish”, “Uyghur”, “Uyghur”, “Turkic” or “Turkish Uyghur”. The well-known Uyghur translator Shengu Sheritutong who lived within the early eleventh century translated the Chinese language phrase “Xiongnu” into “Turkic Zhuoerbodun” in his Seventh-century work “The Biography of Xuanzang”.
Though trendy Chinese language historians attempt to deny the blood relationship between Uyghurs and Huns to be able to obey the orders of the Chinese language authorities, they can not deny that the Jiuwei persons are Uyghurs. As a result of this historic fact is recorded in Chinese language historic supplies in addition to Persian and Arabic historic supplies up to now. For instance, within the e book “Hududur Vasan” written in 932 AD, “The Jiuyuget Kingdom is inhabited by Qin, southern Tibet and elements of Gark. There are Kyrgyz folks within the west and Kyrgyz folks extensively unfold within the north. ”. 9 single states are the biggest among the many Turkic states. That is the nation with the biggest single inhabitants ever, with a complete of 9 singles. Prior to now, all rulers of Turkestan had been 9-Oit folks.
Chinese language authorities lied that the Uyghurs had been immigrants, that the Chinese language had been indigenous to the Tarim Valley, that the Chinese language had lived right here for the reason that Han Dynasty, and that Chinese language was the official language. These lies had been found within the Chinese language authorities’s “Historical past of Xinjiang” White Stone center. They attempt to flip their judgment into politics.
The Chinese language authorities’s technique of distorting actual historical past and forcing different international locations to consider in synthetic historical past is an absurd transfer that started within the Tang Dynasty and continues to this present day. It’s a incontrovertible fact that the Tarim Valley is the hometown of the Huns, the ancestors of the Uyghurs. Attempting to disclaim this plain fact in Chinese language historic knowledge is nothing greater than Chinese language politics abusing science, distorting actual historical past, and turning the occupation of historical past into the artwork of “plucking feathers from eggs.” As described after 840 years in the past, the Tarim Valley was the homeland of the Uighurs 840 years in the past.
