Uniswap Labs is difficult a proposed rulemaking by the U.S. Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) that will increase the definition of a cryptocurrency “alternate” underneath U.S. securities legal guidelines to incorporate decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. The problem, filed in a letter to the SEC, follows current Supreme Court docket rulings that might affect the interpretation and enforceability of such regulatory expansions.
Uniswap challenges SEC
Uniswap Labs chief authorized officer Katherine Minarik revealed the corporate’s transfer in a publish on Utility in Rulemaking. “For higher or worse, the Supreme Court docket denied Chevron deference. Even with that deference, the SEC’s proposal was flawed — much more so by right now’s requirements.
right now @Uniswap Labs urges the SEC to not proceed with its proposed rulemaking, which might considerably and inappropriately increase the definition of “alternate” to incorporate DeFi and extra. 1/x
— Catherine Minarik (@MinarikLaw) July 9, 2024
Chevron deference has traditionally allowed courts to defer to federal businesses’ interpretations of ambiguous laws inside their jurisdiction. The landmark resolution in Loper Brilliant Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo dominated that federal businesses should extra strictly adhere to the statutory textual content, which has implications for the SEC’s present enforcement actions concentrating on the complete crypto trade.
Within the letter, Uniswap Labs detailed its place towards the SEC’s proposal to amend the definition of a cryptocurrency “alternate” within the Securities Trade Act of 1934. A market or facility collectively.” Vendor of securities. ” The adjustments proposed by the SEC purpose to increase this definition to incorporate not solely conventional securities buying and selling platforms, but in addition decentralized protocols akin to Uniswap.
The corporate’s submitting expressed a robust authorized place that the SEC’s broader definition shouldn’t be supported by the Trade Act’s statutory language. The letter argued that broadening the definition to incorporate decentralized networks and applied sciences goes past the invoice’s present scope and will face authorized challenges in mild of current Supreme Court docket rulings. Minarik stated this might result in “illegal guidelines” that will waste council and trade sources.
The letter cited two current court docket circumstances to additional spotlight the potential authorized implications: SEC v. Binance Holdings and SEC v. Coinbase. In each circumstances, federal courts expressed doubts concerning the SEC’s strategy to regulating the complete crypto trade by way of enforcement actions quite than clear, established guidelines.
Uniswap Labs stated that these circumstances reveal the judicial department’s opposition to making use of conventional securities legal guidelines to the decentralized points of the cryptocurrency market, which can point out that courts could also be receptive to the SEC’s proposed rule adjustments.
Uniswap’s letter additionally advised that the SEC ought to think about the affect of Loper Brilliant’s resolution and reopen the remark interval on its proposal. This may permit for added trade enter given adjustments within the authorized atmosphere following the choice.
At press time, UNI was buying and selling at $8.24.

Featured photographs from Uniswap, charts from TradingView.com