Mark Zuckerberg, the so-called champion of innovation and democracy, has turned Fb and Meta into dystopian nightmares, silencing voices he deems unworthy and manipulating the movement of data.
The billionaire’s obsession with censorship has turned what was as soon as a platform free of charge expression right into a digital gulag, the place conservative views are systematically suppressed.
Because the 2020 election, his platform has been on the forefront of suppressing conservative voices, whereas hiding underneath the guise of “fact-checking” and “misinformation management.”
Let’s not overlook the a whole lot of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} he controversially donated to election efforts through the 2020 marketing campaign, cash that was used to bolster liberal strongholds underneath the pretext of supporting “election infrastructure.”
The so-called “Zucker Buck” scandal has triggered an uproar in conservative circles, with many rightly accusing Zuckerberg of interfering within the electoral course of to sway the end result in favor of the Democrats.
The hundreds of thousands of {dollars} he poured into native elections had been truly an try and skew the vote by boosting turnout in Democratic precincts.
Study extra about Zuckerbucks:
In 2021, information that the Biden administration was pressuring Meta to take away content material associated to COVID-19 uncovered the depth of his collusion with left-wing elites.
As a substitute of standing up free of charge speech, Zuckerberg is on his knees, desirous to censor any speech that’s inconsistent with the Biden regime’s agenda.
His willingness to function a private propaganda machine for the Biden regime is additional proof that Meta will not be a impartial platform—it’s an extension of the left’s totalitarian playbook.
Final month, Zuckerberg publicly acknowledged that Fb dad or mum firm Meta was underneath relentless strain from the Biden regime to censor COVID-19-related content material, even when the content material was satirical or humorous, in addition to the notorious Hunter Biden be aware kind laptop.
The Meta CEO is alleged to have expressed deep “remorse” for not being extra vocal about resisting authorities calls for, saying “authorities strain was misplaced” and that he now acknowledges that his firm ought to Be extra vocal about authorities overreach.
Zuckerberg’s newest so-called “remorse” is nothing greater than political theater.
Zuckerberg’s slide into authoritarianism is nothing new. Sincerely, Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit spoke to Congress again in 2018.
TGP discusses and presents proof of widespread censorship and elimination of conservative content material on Fb.
Transcript of my testimony:
Over the previous 19 months, Gateway Pundit has seen our Fb site visitors drop from 24% of complete web site site visitors in January 2017 to 2% of complete web site site visitors in June 2018.
Fb site visitors dropped by 88%.
Lately, we analyzed site visitors information from among the high conservative publishers in america All we discovered was Stunning. Simply as Gateway Pundit was banned from its readers by Fb, Fb eradicated 93% [2]The mixed referral site visitors of those web sites comes from January 2017 to Might 2018.
The Western Each day web site and its different conservative web sites have greater than billion Web page views in 2016. Likewise, Klicked Media, which owns greater than 60 conservative web sites, has misplaced 400 million web page views from Fb previously six months in contrast with final 12 months. Complete pageviews misplaced[3] The 2 conservative on-line publishers alone obtained greater than 1.5 billion web page views on Fb in a 12 months.
After the 2016 election, Fb started altering its algorithm to make sure customers not selected conservative information. Two research launched in March 2018 affirm this. A research by The Define[4] Conservative publishers had been discovered to be the worst hit by current Fb algorithm adjustments, with The Gateway Pundit among the many worst hit.
The billionaire CEO of Meta has reportedly employed a Republican strategist to restore his fractured relationship with conservative media, in response to The New York Occasions .
However don’t be fooled by this sudden about-face—it’s nothing greater than a determined try and rebrand itself after years of totalitarian censorship that silenced conservative voices on Fb and Instagram.
The New York Occasions reviews:
Zuckerberg has not publicly engaged with Washington, however has been repairing relationships with politicians behind the scenes. Following the criticism, Zuckerberg employed distinguished Republican strategist Brian Baker to enhance his standing with right-wing media and Republican officers. An individual conversant in the matter stated that earlier than the November election, Baker burdened to Trump and his high aides that Zuckerberg had no plans to make the same donation.
Zuckerberg has but to develop a relationship with Vice President Kamala Harris. However this summer season, Zuckerberg had his first dialog with Trump since leaving workplace, in response to folks conversant in the matter.
In a cellphone name through the Republican Nationwide Conference in Milwaukee, Trump thanked the billionaire for publicly saying he was “praying” for Trump following the current assassination try, in response to an individual conversant in the matter.
Just a few weeks later, they talked once more.
After Meta mistakenly eliminated a picture of an assassination try that circulated on Meta, Zuckerberg referred to as the previous president instantly and apologized for the error, in response to two folks conversant in the matter. Representatives for Trump and Zuckerberg provided totally different variations of what occurred through the name.
“Private discussions between President Trump and others are non-public solely,” Trump marketing campaign spokesman Steven Cheung stated.
In accordance with the New York Occasions, Zuckerberg is now attempting to painting himself as extra “liberal or classical liberal.”
It was a determined ploy to salvage Mehta’s picture amongst conservatives who had lengthy since deserted his platform.
Meta’s monitor document speaks for itself: censoring, suppressing and manipulating public discourse. Whether or not it’s silencing conservative voices or pandering to progressive elites, Zuckerberg’s totalitarian management of data poses a severe menace to free speech and the material of democracy. We should not let his intelligent rebranding idiot us into turning into complacent.
