Whereas Prop. 22 supplies staff with some protections, equivalent to 120% of the native minimal wage for each hour pushed, medical insurance advantages, and reimbursement for office accidents, it falls far wanting what Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and others would have finished if a employee have been categorized as an worker. , you will need to present Instacart and different providers.
Uber, Lyft and DoorDash have all issued responses supporting the court docket’s choice. “From the second it grew to become regulation, Proposition 22 has served the hundreds of thousands of drivers and couriers who generate profits on platforms like ours,” Uber wrote in a submit on its web site. “Up to now To this point, Uber alone has introduced greater than $1 billion in direct advantages.”
Opponents of Proposition 22 have been dismayed by the result. “Though Proposition 22 is inconsistent with our state structure, the state Supreme Courtroom has allowed tech corporations to purchase their method out of primary labor legal guidelines,” California Federation of Labor President Lorena Gonzalez mentioned in an announcement. “We’re deeply disillusioned that these corporations are upending our social contract, forcing staff and the general public to tackle the inherent dangers of this work whereas profiting. “
Different places, equivalent to Massachusetts, Minneapolis and New York Metropolis, already provide some protections to Uber, Lyft and DoorDash drivers, however they’re nonetheless categorized as contractors.
