A few 12 months in the past, the far-left web site Deadspin accused a 9-year-old Chiefs fan named Holden Armenta of being a racist for sporting what they claimed was blackface.
In truth, the boy’s face was painted within the crew’s colours: pink and black. His mother and father vowed to sue.
Gateway Pundit reported on the time:
The mother and father of 9-year-old Kansas Metropolis Chiefs fan Holden Armenta are threatening to sue the outlet and reporter after they had been defamed by Deadspin reporter Carron Phillips.
Karen Phillips posted a misleading photograph displaying just one facet of her face, defaming an harmless little one attending Sunday’s recreation between Kansas Metropolis and Las Vegas.
“It takes loads of effort to disrespect each teams of individuals on the similar time. However on Sunday afternoon in Las Vegas, a Kansas Metropolis Chiefs fan discovered a method to hate black individuals and Native Individuals on the similar time,” Philip Si wrote, accusing the kid of “blackface.”
The corporate has since modified homeowners and many individuals have been laid off.
The corporate additionally tried to dismiss the lawsuit, however a decide refused. The lawsuit can transfer ahead.
The New York Put up reported:
Deadspin loses defamation lawsuit over article accusing younger Chiefs fan of racism
A Delaware decide has refused to dismiss a defamation lawsuit towards sports activities web site Deadspin that accused a 9-year-old NFL fan and his household of being racially profiled due to their game-day apparel.
The lawsuit was filed by California residents Raul Armenta Jr. and his spouse, Shannon, on behalf of themselves and their son, Holden. recreation towards the Las Vegas Raiders.
In keeping with the lawsuit, Holden (known as “HA” within the lawsuit) was a Chiefs fan and beloved his household’s Chumash Indian heritage. He wore a Chiefs jersey in the course of the recreation, together with his face painted half pink and half black, and a Native American headdress…
On Monday, Superior Court docket Choose Sean Lugg denied Deadspin’s movement to dismiss the Armentas’ lawsuit, rejecting the argument that the article was opinion and due to this fact immune from legal responsibility for defamation.
“Deadspin revealed a photograph of a kid displaying his passionate fandom as context for criticizing the NFL’s range efforts and, in its depiction of the kid, crossed the road to guard his speech from defamation claims,” ​​the decide wrote. boundaries.
Deadspin made an enormous mistake in attacking this harmless little one, and it seems like they could find yourself paying a heavy worth for it.
